cross-examination – Law Journals

Evidence: More than meets the eye

Stuart Barlow highlights considerations in cases involving the prohibition of cross-examination by litigants in person While the appointment of a qualified legal representative will reduce some of the trauma of direct questioning by the perpetrator, the perpetrator could still frame the questions and it may be difficult for a lawyer in that role to determine …

Continue reading "Evidence: More than meets the eye"

This post is only available to members.

Cross-examination: As good as it gets?

David Wilkinson explores the prohibition of cross-examination in person in family proceedings provisions and asks if they are fit for purpose It is foreseeable that a qualified legal representative may need to make certain applications in family proceedings in order to discharge fully their professional obligations regarding effective cross-examination. The practicalities of this do not …

Continue reading "Cross-examination: As good as it gets?"

This post is only available to members.