Financial provision: Exploring the options

Raworths LLP | March 2022 #211
Ellie Foster considers a decision of Mostyn J on set aside and transparency in financial remedy proceedings In assessing unforeseeability in the context of a change of asset value, the court should focus on the economic impact of the event rather than its cause or nature. The onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020 …

Continue reading "Financial provision: Exploring the options"

This post is only available to members.

Barder: Exceptional and rare

Kingsley Napley LLP | September 2021 #206
Cate Maguire looks at how the Barder principle has been applied in cases involving ‘known unknowns’ Neither of the decisions in S v T and HW v WW represent a restriction or characterisation of the Barder principle, but rather affirmation of its exceptionality, even in these most unusual times. The family courts have recently had …

Continue reading "Barder: Exceptional and rare"

This post is only available to members.

Financial provision: Risky business

Slater Heelis | July/August 2021 #205
David Wilkinson analyses a recent decision on an application to set aside based on the impact of Covid-19 on asset values In FRB v DCA (No 3), a dearth of evidence regarding the specific impact of the pandemic on the husband’s extensive asset base, which ranged across various countries and industries, coupled with unfavourable findings …

Continue reading "Financial provision: Risky business"

This post is only available to members.