Undue influence claims: What remedies?

Mark Pawlowski examines the remedies available to an undue influence claimant under English law ‘Considerable doubt remains as to whether equitable compensation is available in every case of undue influence or only those in which there is an equivalent fiduciary relationship of, say, solicitor and client or trustee and beneficiary.’ The effect of a finding …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145
  • Allied Irish Bank plc v Byrne [1995] 2 FLR 325
  • Barclays Bank plc v Caplan [1998] 1 FLR 532
  • Bridgeman v Green (1755) Wilm 58
  • Bullock v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1955] 1 Ch 317
  • Castle Phillips Finance v Piddington (1995) 70 P&CR 592
  • Cheese v Thomas [1994] 1 All ER 35
  • Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem [1998] 3 All ER 876
  • Goldsworthy v Brickell [1987] 1 All ER 853
  • Guinness plc v Saunders [1989] UKHL 2
  • Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548
  • MacKenzie v Royal Bank of Canada [1934] AC 468
  • Mahoney v Purnell [1996] 3 All ER 61
  • Midland Bank plc v Greene [1994] 2 FLR 827
  • Mitchell v Homfray (1881) 8 QBD 587
  • Moxon v Payne (1873) LR 8 Ch App 881
  • Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932
  • O’Sullivan v Management Agency & Music Ltd [1985] QB 428
  • TSB Bank plc v Camfield [1995] 1 All ER 951
  • Turner v Collins (1871) LR 7 Ch App 329
  • United States Surgical Corp v Hospital Products International Property Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 766
  • Wright v Vanderplank (1856) 8 De GM & G 133