Continue reading "Rights To Light: A trick of the light"
This post is only available to members.
Rights To Light: A trick of the light
What is and what is not a consent under s3 of the Prescription Act 1832 can be a tricky question to answer, as Andrew Francis finds out ‘Quite apart from whether the provision is a consent within s3, another commonly encountered issue is whether the provision can bind, or benefit, successors in title.’ Section 3 …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- CGIS City Plaza Shares Ltd v Britel Fund Trustees Ltd [2012] EWHC 1594 (Ch)
- Fear v Morgan [1907] AC 425
- Hyman v Van den Bergh [1908] 1 Ch 167
- Marlborough (West End) Ltd. v Wilks Head & Eve [1996] NLD 156
- Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [2005] EWHC 33 (Ch)
- Paragon Finance plc v City of London Real Property Company Ltd [2001] EWHC Ch 483
- Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2009] EWHC 2624 (Comm); [2010] EWCA Civ 582; [2011] UKSC 50
- RHJ Ltd v FT Patten (Holdings) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 151
- Salvage Wharf v G&S Brough Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 21