Continue reading "Proprietary Estoppel: Down on the farm"
This post is only available to members.
Proprietary Estoppel: Down on the farm
Rebecca Cattermole highlights the current position on the doctrine of estoppel in the context of recent case law ‘It was a useful working hypothesis to take a sliding scale by which the clearer the expectation, the greater the detriment.’ The case of Moore v Moore [2016] is the most recent illustration of the treatment of …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Assicurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group (BSC) [2002] EWCA Civ 1642
- Campbell v Griffin [2001] WTLR 981
- Crabb v Arun District Council [1975] EWCA Civ 7
- Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd & ors v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23
- Davies & anr v Davies [2016] EWCA Civ 463
- Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66; [2000] WTLR 195 CA
- Henry & anor v Henry [2010] WTLR 1011
- Hopgood v Brown [1955] EWCA Civ 7
- Jennings v Rice & ors [2002] EWCA Civ 159; [2002] WTLR 367 CA
- Moore v Moore [2016] EWHC 2202 (Ch)
- Shirt v Shirt [2012] EWCA Civ 1029; [2013] WTLR 317
- Suggitt v Suggitt & anr [2012] EWCA Civ 1140; [2012] WTLR 1607 CA
- Thorner v Major & ors [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] WTLR 713 HL
- Wayling v Jones (1995) 69 P & CR 170