Continue reading "Apportionment Of Rent: Breaking up is hard to do – part 2"
This post is only available to members.
Apportionment Of Rent: Breaking up is hard to do – part 2
Dan Cuthbert assesses the problem with Ellis v Rowbotham in the light of a recent decision ‘Morgan J concluded that a reasonable person reading the lease would expect that in a case where the break clause was operated to take effect on 24 January 2012 that the rent would be payable for the term to …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AG of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10
- Canonical UK Ltd v TST Millbank LLC [2012] EWHC 3710 (Ch)
- Capital & City Holdings Ltd v Dean Warburg Ltd [1989] 1 EGLR 90
- Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740
- Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company Ltd [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch); [2014] EWCA Civ 603; [2015] UKSC 72
- Ocelota Ltd v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation [2000] NSWSC 370
- PCE Investors Ltd v Cancer Research UK [2012] EWHC 884 (Ch)
- Quirkco Investments Ltd v Aspray Transport Ltd [2011] EWHC 3060 (Ch)
- Wehner v Dene Steam Shipping Co [1905] 2 KB 92
- York v Casey [1998] 2 EGLR 25