Fundamental Dishonesty: A forecast for fraud – and a chance of meatballs

In part one of this two-part article Martin Littler discusses the arguments and findings in Carol Ravenscroft v Ikea Limited ‘Had the claimant lost the case, the claimant may have lost more than the damages; the claimant was concerned at the loss of her own employment; had a finding of fraud or fundamental dishonesty been …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced