Continue reading "Costs: Out with the old"
This post is only available to members.
Costs: Out with the old
Paul Jones sets out the lack of consensus on proportionality since the end of ATE premiums and success fees ‘Regarding the exclusion of the ATE premium when considering proportionality, the master, again, drew a distinction between the pre-April 2013 rules, where the ATE would have been considered separately, and the new rules, where there was …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- BNM v Mirror Group Newspapers [2016] EWHC B1 (Costs)
- King v Basildon & Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Trust [2016] EWHC B32 (Costs)
- Lownds v Home Office [2002] EWCA Civ 365
- Murrells v Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC B2 (Costs)
- Rezek-Clarke v Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC B5 (Costs)
- Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1134