Costs: A costly review

Paul Jones analyses the most noteworthy cases over the past year ‘A court still has a discretion to assess costs on the standard basis by reference to the sum that would have been recoverable on the small claims track if the case had been allocated to that track.’ The end of the year seems like …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • Aldridge v Ferguson (Unreported, Bristol CC, 10 June 2011)
  • Amin v Mullings [2011] EWHC 278 (QB)
  • Beal v Russell (Unreported, SCCO, 8 February 2011)
  • Bradley v Windsor Group Practice (Unreported, Leeds QBD, 10 January 2011)
  • Bridle v Ikhlas (Unreported Oxford CC 22 February 2011)
  • Dockerill v Tullet (Unreported Birmingham CC 7 April 2011)
  • F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd v Bathelemy and Culligan [2011] EWHC 2807 (Ch)
  • Gray v Toner (Unreported Liverpool CC 11 January 2011)
  • Griffin v Wisbech Phab Club (Unreported, Norwich CC, 11 July 2011)
  • Hurndell v Hozier & ors [2011] EWHC 321 (Ch)
  • Langsam v Beachcroft LLP [2011] EWHC 1451 (Ch)
  • Lisbie v SKS Scaff olding Ltd [2011] EWHC 90203 (Costs)
  • MGN Ltd v United Kingdom (2011 Application No. 39401/04)
  • Motto & ors v Trafigura Ltd & anor (Rev 3) [2011] EWCA Civ 1150
  • Motto & ors v Trafigura Ltd & anor [2011] EWHC 90201 (Costs)
  • Nazari v Arborecare (Unreported, Bournemouth CC, 28 January 2011)
  • O’Leary v Tunnelcraft Ltd [2009] EWHC 3438 (QB)
  • Potts-Pointer v Gildacroft (Unreported, SCCO, 12 January 2011)
  • Redwing Construction Ltd v Wishart [2011] EWHC 19 (TCC)
  • Shah v Elliot (Unreported, Rotherham CC, 27 June 2011)
  • Smith v Wyatt; Rennie v Logistic Management (2011) (13.1.11 Cambridge CC HHJ Moloney QC) (Lawtel 5.4.11)