This category can only be viewed by members.
Martin Meredith analyses a recent ECJ decision on the role of in-house lawyers ‘The ECJ reinforced the Akzo reasoning that a lawyer’s independence can be determined positively – by reference to professional obligations – but also negatively by reference to the absence of an employment relationship.’ The decision of Prezes Urzedu Komunikacji Elekronicnej & Republic …
Continue reading "Conduct: Independent thinking"
This post is only available to members.
Philippa Charles and Al Trent consider the vexed question of which law governs an arbitration agreement ‘The House of Lords made clear in Fiona Trust v Privalov [2007], an arbitration agreement is separable from its parent contract. It must be considered – in effect – as a separate contract.’ Arbitration practitioners will be aware that …
Continue reading "Jurisdiction: Rules of the road"
This post is only available to members.
Dan Smith discusses when proceedings can be stayed because of earlier proceedings elsewhere in the EU ‘Parties should consider very carefully how and where they commence proceedings. This can have long-lasting and serious consequences in multinational disputes.’ The English Court of Appeal has considered the application of Articles 27 and 28 of Brussels Regulation 44/2001 …
Continue reading "Forum: Let’s take this fight elsewhere"
This post is only available to members.
John MacKenzie reviews recent case law on security for costs ‘These two cases point to a possible difference in approach towards ATE policies in security for costs applications in Scotland and England.’ In Geophysical Service Centre Company Ltd v Dowell Schlumberger (Middle East) Inc [2013], the defendant applied for security for costs. The defendant stated …
Continue reading "Procedure: Feeling secure"
This post is only available to members.
Jonathan Speed and Claire Morel de Westgaver consider whether arbitration should do more to embrace summary judgment procedures ‘Recent developments suggest that the industry is preparing for a shift from litigation to arbitration as a mechanism to resolve financial disputes and derivatives disputes in particular.’ A criticism that is often levied at international arbitration is …
Continue reading "Arbitration: Cutting to the chase"
This post is only available to members.
Clare Arthurs and Alex Fox reflect on the Supreme Court judgment in Nutritek The Supreme Court clearly declined to extend the circumstances in which the corporate veil may be pierced. The corporate veil has been in the limelight of late. The Court of Appeal in VTB Capital v Nutritek International Corp [2012] kept it drawn …
Continue reading "Company: Dance of the corporate veil"
This post is only available to members.
Martin Meredith reviews the implications of recent case law on in-house lawyers In-house lawyers are like no other employee – by reason of their role, they hold a position of trust, influence and confidence, acting solely in the interests of their employer/client. The Court of Appeal’s decision in Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & …
Continue reading "Practice: Biting the hand that fed you"
This post is only available to members.
Joanna Ludlam and Fiona Lockhart examine the likely impact of the Prudential judgment The provision of legal advice is not the sole preserve of lawyers and in these challenging commercial times clients do not want to have to pay for ‘legal filters’ (having their lawyers instruct third parties whom they could instruct themselves).In a much …
Continue reading "Privilege: A privileged upbringing"
This post is only available to members.
David Sawtell looks at the calculation of Wrotham Park damages It is reasonable for the court to look at the eventual outcome and to consider whether or not that is a useful guide to what the parties would have thought at the time of their hypothetical bargain where there has been nothing like an actual …
Continue reading "Damages: Park life"
This post is only available to members.
David Robinson discusses a recent case on the ambit of a solicitor’s duties NIAL relied upon the fact that the limit of indemnity of Eversheds’ professional indemnity insurance greatly exceeded £3m and also that Eversheds had failed to explain the effect of either clause to NIAL before the retainer was signed. In Newcastle International Airport …
Continue reading "Negligence: Flight testing"
This post is only available to members.
