This category can only be viewed by members.
Meeta Kaur provides a timely reminder of the CIL and the basics of how it is intended to operate ‘Regulations 122 and 123 of the CIL Regulations provide the legislative basis that is intended to establish the relationship between the CIL and s106 agreements once the CIL is adopted in an area.’The Community Infrastructure Levy …
Continue reading "Planning And Environment Update: Community infrastructure levy"
This post is only available to members.
Jamie Kidd reviews Coventry v Lawrence and its implications for those affected by noise nuisance ‘It is a question of fact in every case whether the grant of planning permission followed by steps to implement such permission do have the effect of changing the character of the locality.’ Every person is entitled to the comfortable …
Continue reading "Nuisance: Influence of planning permissions"
This post is only available to members.
Kathleen Fitzgerald looks at two cases where the courts stuck to a rigorous application of the provisions of s2 ‘The need for formality means that negotiations to transact with land will not bind the parties before they are ready to commit fully to what is agreed between them.’ It is perhaps unsurprising in the current …
Continue reading "Contractual Formalities: Section 2 of the 1989 Act in the spotlight"
This post is only available to members.
Stephen Barry assesses the intricacies of mineral reservations in the context of recent case law ‘Most types of “mineral” have all been held by the courts in various instances either to be included in a mineral reservation or to be excluded from it. Much depends on the wording of the individual reservation, and its meaning …
Continue reading "Mineral Reservations: Finding a way through the minefield"
This post is only available to members.
Magnus Hassett examines three recent high-profile court decisions and what they mean for landowners and their advisers ‘In the three cases considered, the court concluded that the law did not allow them to compensate the claimants for their injuries, no matter how desirable that outcome might seem given the catastrophic and life-changing injuries suffered by …
Continue reading "Occupiers: The extent of the duty"
This post is only available to members.
Jane Rogers reviews recent case law relating to relevance of previous expert determinations ‘In a sluggish market where direct market evidence is scarce, valuers often have to fall back on the rents determined by third-party surveyors acting as independent expert or arbitrator.’ Valuers and lawyers alike, engaged in the business of establishing the open-market rental …
Continue reading "Expert Determination: Use in a rent review or lease renewal"
This post is only available to members.
Gillian Baxter reflects on when an informally created easement is enforceable against a purchaser of the land over which it is exercised ‘To provide greater certainty, the Land Registration Act 2002 reduced the number of unregistered rights that bind a purchaser, making it even more important that easements are protected on the register.’ A recent …
Continue reading "Easements: Protect it or lose it!"
This post is only available to members.
Ben Gildea considers the current position in respect of how a person’s entitlement to the equitable interest in a property may be ascertained following a leading Supreme Court decision. ‘From now on, a party may argue that the terms on which their equitable interests are held have changed over time.’ In Britain, there are more …
Continue reading "Co-Ownership: Breaking up is hard to do"
This post is only available to members.
Nicholas Cheffings looks at Mary Portas’ report on how to revive the high street ‘There is a fairly fundamental difference between having a unit occupied for the sake of it and having a unit occupied in a way that actually enhances the high street.’On 13 December 2011, a report on the BBC suggested that a …
Continue reading "The Portas Review: The landlord’s perspective"
This post is only available to members.
Kate Andrews discusses a case that highlights the costs consequences of a refusal to consider ADR Furst QC confirmed in PGF that the burden rested on the claimant to demonstrate why there should be a departure from the general rule that the claimant should be liable for the defendant’s costs. The recent case of PGF …
Continue reading "ADR: A health warning"
This post is only available to members.
