This category can only be viewed by members.

Brexit: Crossing borders

Robert Bell reports on a recent decision of the EFTA Court ‘The question before the court was what level of culpability of a contracting authority was necessary for the court to award damages for breach of the public procurement law.’ A recent public procurement decision of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Court highlights the …
This post is only available to members.

Update: More haste, less speed

Sapna Garg considers a ruling on expedited trials ‘The attempt by Joseph Gleave to have the best of both worlds, by keeping its hat in the ring in the procurement process while at the same time pursuing proceedings against the defendant, didn’t succeed.’ Timing was a critical deciding factor in Joseph Gleave & Son Ltd …
This post is only available to members.

Markets: Can’t take the heat?

James Marshall, Deborah Greenwood, Kenneth Addly and Julia Joseph highlight the Competition and Markets Authority market study into UK heat networks ‘The CMA is particularly concerned that customers may be unable to easily switch suppliers, or may be locked into long-term contracts, with the risk that they may be paying too much or receiving a …
This post is only available to members.

Policy: It’s only money

Michael Winder examines a European Commission initiative ‘The Commission wants to help member states improve the skills, knowledge and understanding of buyers to ensure compliance with procurement law and best value for money.’ In the autumn of 2017, the European Commission announced a new procurement initiative aiming to encourage member states to undertake public procurement …
This post is only available to members.

Practice: On the wrong track

Rebecca Williams and Ben Lamble discuss a recent case dealing with disclosure ‘The lesson for prospective claimants is clear: the strict time limits imposed on public procurement claims will be executed robustly in all but the most extreme cases.’ The Technology and Construction Court (the TCC) has recently recognised that public procurement cases, particularly those …
This post is only available to members.

UK Infrastructure: A strong and stable future?

James Parker and Clare Eccles consider the future of infrastructure planning ‘Since 2015 information released by the government on infrastructure planning in the UK has markedly diminished.’ The 2010-15 Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government presided over what, in hindsight, could be heralded a ‘golden era’ for infrastructure planning in the UK. Helmed by Prime Minister David …
This post is only available to members.

Confidentiality: Cards on the table

Kerri Crossen, Jean-Anne Young and Patrick Kane examine confidentiality in Irish public procurement proceedings ‘While contracting authorities may be eager to disclose information in order to begin the 30-day period to bring a challenge to a tender process, they should at all times bear in mind their obligations under Reg 21 of the 2016 Regulations …
This post is only available to members.

Procedure: Tell me more

Fran Mussellwhite explores the principles behind the submission of supplementary information after the deadline for bid submissions ‘Negotiation between a contracting authority and a bidder during a procurement is prohibited and as a general rule, a bid cannot be amended after it has been submitted.’ A series of recent European cases have focused on the …
This post is only available to members.

Contracting: Regular supplies

Melanie Pears and Tim Care take a look at the recently published Supplier Code of Conduct ‘Suppliers must treat subcontractors fairly; they must not pass unreasonable levels of risk to the subcontractors who cannot reasonably be expected to manage or carry those risks.’ The Supplier Code of Conduct has been introduced by the government with …
This post is only available to members.

Update: Sign of the times

Jorren Knibbe concludes his review of some noteworthy decisions of the UK and European courts ‘It is not clear from the EU procurement Directives how they are intended to operate where a technical specification is discriminatory but can be justified. In those circumstances, the result under the Directives and under Art 34 ought to be …
This post is only available to members.