Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journals
    • The Commercial Litigation Journal
    • Employment Law Journal
    • Family Law Journal
    • Personal Injury Law Journal
    • Procurement & Outsourcing Journal
    • Property Law Journal
    • Trusts & Estates Law and Tax Journal
  • WTLR
  • Search
  • Contact
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • Privacy Policy
  • Indices

Home » Family Law Journal » October 2018 #180 » Private children: Maintaining a balance

Private children: Maintaining a balance

Rayden Solicitors
Share
Share
Email
WhatsApp
Tweet
+1
Reddit

Kayleigh Biswas asks whether orders restricting further applications in children proceedings are an underused mechanism, or a heavy-handed approach to conclude litigation

You must be logged in and have an active subscription to view full content.



Cases Referenced

Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.

  • DJ v MS [2006] EWHC 1491 (Fam)
  • EG v JG [2013] EW Misc 21 (CC)
  • Re A (Application for Leave) [1998] 1 FLR 1
  • Re B (Section 91(14) Order: Duration) [2003] EWCA Civ 1966
  • Re C (a child) [2009] EWCA Civ 674
  • Re C-R (Children)(Contact) [2014] EWCA Civ 1627
  • Re J (a Child) [2007] EWCA Civ 906
  • Re M-D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1363
  • Re P (Section 91(14) Guidelines) (Residence and Religious Heritage) [1999] EWCA Civ 1323
  • Re R (residence: contact: restricting applications) [1998] 1 FLR 749
  • Re S (children) (restriction on applications); Re E (a child) (restriction on applications) [2006] EWCA Civ 1190
  • Stringer v Stringer [2006] EWCA Civ 1617

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Financial provision: A helping hand
Next PostNext Periodical payments: Unclear path

Author

Rayden Solicitors logo

Rayden Solicitors

Kayleigh Biswas is a solicitor at Rayden Solicitors

Login

  • Lost Password

Search the site...

More from this issue…

  • Vardags logo Divorce: No way out
    Vardags
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP logo Domestic abuse: The full picture?
    Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
  • Hall Brown logo Evidence: Going undercover
    Hall Brown
  • St John's Buildings (Chambers of Sally Harrison QC) logo Financial provision: Sharing the burden
    St John's Buildings (Chambers of Sally Harrison QC)
  • Setfords Solicitors logo In practice: Conflicting views
    Setfords Solicitors
  • SA Law LLP logo Disclosure: No place to hide
    SA Law LLP

Related Content…

    Slater and Gordon logo
  • Private children: To the letter
    Slater and Gordon
    Family Law Journal
  • Bell & Buxton logo
  • Private children: Extended families
    Bell & Buxton
    Family Law Journal
  • Rayden Solicitors logo
  • Private children: Overcoming obstacles
    Rayden Solicitors
    Family Law Journal
  • Rayden Solicitors logo
  • Private children: Conflicting interests
    Rayden Solicitors
    Family Law Journal
  • Burgess Mee logo
  • Private Children: A holistic approach
    Burgess Mee
    Family Law Journal

Cases referenced

Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.

  • DJ v MS [2006] EWHC 1491 (Fam)
  • EG v JG [2013] EW Misc 21 (CC)
  • Re A (Application for Leave) [1998] 1 FLR 1
  • Re B (Section 91(14) Order: Duration) [2003] EWCA Civ 1966
  • Re C (a child) [2009] EWCA Civ 674
  • Re C-R (Children)(Contact) [2014] EWCA Civ 1627
  • Re J (a Child) [2007] EWCA Civ 906
  • Re M-D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1363
  • Re P (Section 91(14) Guidelines) (Residence and Religious Heritage) [1999] EWCA Civ 1323
  • Re R (residence: contact: restricting applications) [1998] 1 FLR 749
  • Re S (children) (restriction on applications); Re E (a child) (restriction on applications) [2006] EWCA Civ 1190
  • Stringer v Stringer [2006] EWCA Civ 1617
© Legalease Ltd, 188 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG