Kayleigh Biswas asks whether orders restricting further applications in children proceedings are an underused mechanism, or a heavy-handed approach to conclude litigation
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- DJ v MS [2006] EWHC 1491 (Fam)
- EG v JG [2013] EW Misc 21 (CC)
- Re A (Application for Leave) [1998] 1 FLR 1
- Re B (Section 91(14) Order: Duration) [2003] EWCA Civ 1966
- Re C (a child) [2009] EWCA Civ 674
- Re C-R (Children)(Contact) [2014] EWCA Civ 1627
- Re J (a Child) [2007] EWCA Civ 906
- Re M-D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1363
- Re P (Section 91(14) Guidelines) (Residence and Religious Heritage) [1999] EWCA Civ 1323
- Re R (residence: contact: restricting applications) [1998] 1 FLR 749
- Re S (children) (restriction on applications); Re E (a child) (restriction on applications) [2006] EWCA Civ 1190
- Stringer v Stringer [2006] EWCA Civ 1617