Continue reading "Financial provison: Behind the scenes"
This post is only available to members.
Financial provison: Behind the scenes
Amy Harris analyses a case involving the consideration of a resulting trust, inheritance prospects and whether support from a third party could be inferred ‘The husband did not have a beneficial interest in the former matrimonial home as it was subject to a resulting trust and therefore not a matrimonial resource available for distribution.’ In …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Goodman v Gallant [1985] EWCA Civ 15
- HRH Louis Prince of Luxembourg v HRH Tessy Princess of Luxembourg & anor (Application for Financial Remedy) [2018] EWFC 77
- Michael v Michael [1986] 2 FLR 389
- Pankhania v Chandegra [2013] WTLR 101
- Pettitt v Pettitt [1969] UKHL 5
- Rochefoucauld v Boustead [1897] 1 Ch 196
- Thomas v Thomas [1995] EWCA Civ 51