Continue reading "Financial Provision: Extra special"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Extra special
Claire Reid looks at what is required for the court to conclude that a party has made a stellar contribution ‘The difficulty in comparing different contributions risks discrimination against homemakers. This unfortunate application of the law generates a distasteful distinction in the 21st century.’ In Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] one of the principal issues considered …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Charman v Charman (No 4) [2007] EWCA Civ 503; [2007] WTLR 1151 CA
- Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314 (Fam); [2014] EWHC 4122 (Fam); [2014] EWCA Civ 896
- Cowan v Cowan [2001] EWCA Civ 679
- Evans v Evans [2013] EWHC 506 (Fam)
- FS v JS [2006] EWHC 2793 (Fam)
- H v H (Financial provision: Special contribution) [2002] EWHC 3148
- H v H [2010] EWHC 158 (Fam)
- Lambert v Lambert [2002] EWCA Civ 1685
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42; WTLR(w) 2010-13
- SK v TK [2013] EWHC 834 (Fam)
- White v White [2000] UKHL 54