Continue reading "TUPE: Never a dull moment?"
This post is only available to members.
TUPE: Never a dull moment?
Charles Wynn-Evans rounds up recent case law on service provision changes and other thorny TUPE issues ‘There can be a service provision change where activities are conducted by just one employee. However, the connected issues of the principal purpose of the organised grouping and whether the employee is assigned to that organised grouping can cause …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Case C-164/00 Beckmann v Dynamco Whicheloe Macfarland Ltd [2002] IRLR 578, ECJ
- Case C-186/83 Botzen v Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij BV [1985] ECR 519
- Case C-324/86 Foreningen af Arbejdsledere I Danmark v Daddy's Dance Hall [1988] ECR 739
- Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd v Seawell Ltd [2013] CSIH 59
- Costain Ltd v Armitage [2014] UKEAT/0048/14
- Determination in a complaint by Mr Michael Heyes 23 January 2015 (PO-3333)
- Eddie Stobart Ltd v Moreman & ors [2012] UKEAT 0223/11/1702
- Edinburgh Home-Link Partnership v City of Edinburgh Council [2012] UKEATS/0061/11
- G4S Justice Services (UK) Ltd v Anstey [2006] UKEAT/0698/05
- LLDY Alexandria Ltd (formerly Loch Lomond Distillery Company Ltd) v (1) UNITE the Union (2) People for Work Ltd [2014] UKEATS/0002/14
- London Borough of Hillingdon v Gormanley & ors [2014] UKEAT/0169/14
- McCarrick v Hunter [2012] EWCA Civ 1399
- Metropolitan Resources Ltd v Churchill Dulwich Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0286/08/2406
- Ottimo Property Services Ltd v Duncan [2015] UKEAT/0321/14
- Rynda (UK) Ltd v Rhijnsburger [2015] EWCA Civ 75
- Salmon v Castlebeck Care (Teesdale) Ltd & ors [2014] UKEAT/0304/14
- Taurus Group Ltd v Crofts [2012] UKEAT/0024/12
- Taylor v Connex South Eastern Ltd [2000] UKEAT/1243/99