Continue reading "Employment Status: Keeping it casual"
This post is only available to members.
Employment Status: Keeping it casual
Susie Al-Qassab considers the consequences of three recent decisions in the EAT on the mutuality of obligation test The fact that the claimants worked rostered hours to which they could object if they posed them a problem, did not preclude mutuality of obligation. To establish employee status and enjoy the rights and protections only available …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & ors [2011] UKSC 41
- Consistent Group Ltd v Kalwak [2007] UKEAT 0535/06/1805; [2008] EWCA Civ 430
- Drake v IPSOS Mori UK Ltd [2012] UKEAT 0604/11/ZT
- Knight v Fairway & Kenwood Car Service Ltd UKEAT0075/12/LA (
- Pulse Healthcare v Carewatch Services Ltd [2012] UKEAT/0123/12
- Quashie v Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd [2012] EAT/0289/11/RN; [2012] EWCA Civ 1735
- X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau & ors [2011] EWCA Civ 28