Macintyre & anr v Oliver & ors [2019] WTLR 215
Spring 2019 #174The claimants were the trustees of the trusts arising under the wills of Violet Hamblen-Thomas (Violet) and Charles Hamben-Thomas (Charles). They had issued a Part 8 claim form seeking the guidance of the court as to the true construction of the will trusts and as to the identification of the beneficiaries, represented by the defendants. Apart from her only son, Edwin Hamblen-Thomas (Edwin), Violet had a life-long friend, Enid Simpson, whose daughter was the first and second defendant (Victoria). Violet, by her will dated 16 December 1968 (Violet’s will), gave Charles a life interest in ...
Sheffield v Sheffield & ors [2019] WTLR 295
Spring 2019 #174Following judgment upholding claims for various breaches of trust (Sheffield v Sheffield & ors [2014] WTLR 1039, [2013] EWHC 3927 (Ch)), the judge ordered accounts, on the footing of wilful default, and inquiries consequent upon the judgment. The accounting parties were the executors of (and standing in the shoes of) a defaulting trustee (“A”) and the individual who benefited from the breaches of trust (“B”). Agreement was reached in respect of certain accounts and the claimant (“C”) pursued other accounts and inquiries, in respect of various issues. The judge also ordered t...
Daniel & anr v Tee & ors [2018] WTLR 799
Autumn 2018 #173The defendants were professional solicitor trustees of a trust established by the will of the claimants’ father. The claimants were the beneficiaries of the will trust, who were minors when their father died. The deceased’s will provided that the claimants’ shares would be held on trust for them until they turned 25, so the defendants invested the trust fund with the assistance of professional investment advice given by Taylor Young Investment Management Ltd (Taylor Young).
The claimants subsequently sought compensation from the trustees in the sum of £1,476,076 on the basis that ...
De Muller & anr v Morgan [2018] WTLR 867
Autumn 2018 #173The deceased died in July 2014, still married to the 1st claimant (DM), though they had been separated for many years. The 2nd claimant (A) was one of his daughters from the marriage. The claimants were the administrators of deceased’s estate. The deceased had lived with the defendant (HM) between 1991 and 2003/2005, and had two children with her. She continued to live in a leasehold property (38 WC) owned by the deceased until his death. The deceased’s wills were invalid but indicated an intention for the benefit of 38 WC and the associated mews house to pass to HM on trust for their tw...
Goss-Custard & anr v Templeman [2018] WTLR 893
Autumn 2018 #173The late Lord Templeman (‘the deceased’) died on 4 June 2014 aged 94, leaving a will, dated 22 August 2008 (‘the 2008 Will’). The claimants commenced proceedings seeking an order pronouncing for the validity of the 2008 Will in solemn form. The 1st and 2nd defendants defended the claim on the basis that the deceased lacked testamentary capacity both when he gave his will instructions on 11 August 2008 and when the 2008 Will was executed. They counterclaimed for an order pronouncing for the validity of an earlier will, dated 25 April 2001 (‘the 2001 Will’) and a codicil to it, dated 3 Dec...
Smith-Tyrrell & anr v Bowden [2018] WTLR 987
Autumn 2018 #173The claimants occupied land at Falmouth in Cornwall (the property) initially pursuant to a written agreement for the grant of a 15-year lease from 1 January 1993 at a rent of £400 per annum. The agreement was never signed by the defendant’s parents, who were then the freehold owners, with the result that it did not qualify as a valid agreement for the grant of a tenancy of 15 years, due to failure to comply with the requirements of s2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. After the expiry of the 15-year period, the claimants continued to pay, and the defendant to ac...
Thompson v Raggett & ors [2018] WTLR 1027
Autumn 2018 #173Wynford Hodge died on 4 February 2017 leaving a will under which he gave his residuary estate to the fourth and fifth defendants, who were tenants of one of the deceased’s properties. He made no provision for his partner, the Claimant, with whom he had lived as man and wife for 42 years. It was accepted that the Claimant was financially dependent upon the deceased immediately before his death.
In 2016 the deceased had purchased a cottage with a view to residing there with the Claimant. However, due to ill health, this plan never came to fruition. The deceased died leaving a net es...
Chaston v Chaston [2018] WTLR 391
Summer 2018 #172The parties were three of the four children of Sybil and John Chaston (‘the parents’). They inherited from their parents a freehold property (‘the Property’). The Property was currently held by the Appellants and the Respondent upon trust for the Respondent as to 50%, and as to 25% for each of the two Appellants.
In proceedings brought under s14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 the District Judge ordered that the Property should be sold to the Respondent at a price to be determined by a valuation exercise.
The hearing before the District Judge ...
Davies v Morris [2018] WTLR 405
Summer 2018 #172The defendant in the present claim had brought a probate action in respect of the will of the deceased; the claimants in the present claim were defendants in the probate action. In the course of the probate action the judge made an order in a preliminary application for the determination of the deceased’s domicile at his death. It had been the present defendant’s position that the deceased had retained his domicile of origin in England and Wales, whereas the present claimants had argued that he had acquired a domicile of choice in Belgium, so that under Belgian law the will was void as a...