CICTs And Section 2: Some thoughts from the Bar

Maitland Chambers | Property Law Journal | September 2017 #354
Amanda Tipples QC examines the interaction of common intention constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel in light of the decision in Matchmove v Dowding ‘For a party to succeed on a claim to enforce an oral bargain in respect of land, coupled with reliance and detriment, it needs to base its case on a common intention …

Continue reading "CICTs And Section 2: Some thoughts from the Bar"

This post is only available to members.

Contract: A question of interpretation

University of Greenwich | Property Law Journal | May 2017 #351
Sandra Clarke examines the factors that determine a contract for the disposition of an interest in land ‘The essential terms for a valid contract to sell land are the parties, the property and the consideration.’ The recent Court of Appeal decision in Rollerteam Ltd v Riley [2016] adds to the decided cases surrounding s2(1), Law …

Continue reading "Contract: A question of interpretation"

This post is only available to members.

Proprietary Estoppel: A separate cause of action?

University of Greenwich | Property Law Journal | September 2016 #344
Mark Pawlowski asks whether there is scope for giving effect to informal land agreements by applying the doctrine of proprietary estoppel ‘The question remains as to whether an estoppel on its own (independently of any finding of a constructive trust) can operate so as to enforce an agreement for sale notwithstanding non-compliance with s2(1), Law …

Continue reading "Proprietary Estoppel: A separate cause of action?"

This post is only available to members.