Case: Wheeler v Le Marchant [1881] 17 Ch D 675

Richard Farnhill concludes his examination of privilege and considers if the system is fit for purpose ‘The recent privilege decisions are inconsistent with, and indeed have not considered, the substantive rules on attribution. In the absence of any proper distinction, those rules are binding and the recent privilege decisions are therefore incorrect.’ The first two …

Continue reading "Privilege: Don’t quote me on this"