Executor’s Costs: Neutrality is key

Sian Hodgson gives the lowdown on executor’s costs in litigation, with reference to the recent case of Taylor v Saunders ‘An executor who has been involved in the preparation and execution of a will, in which he is also appointed executor, may naturally wish to “defend” that will’ The issue of an executor’s costs in …
This post is only available to members.

Inter Vivos Gifts: Ascertain the testator’s true intentions

Kloosman v Aylen has clarified the court’s approach towards the presumption against double portions. Matthew Hodson examines the case. Testators may feel rather differently about the division of their estate if they come to understand that it is worth rather more, or less, than they thought. The first question to consider when looking at the …
This post is only available to members.

Morris v Davies & ors [2012] EWHC 1981 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | November 2012 #124

The deceased, Owen Davies (D), was born in England but died in France. He was living in Belgium at the time but owned a house in England and had made a will in England some 12 years before his death under which the fifth defendant, his uncle Clive Davies (Clive), was interested in residue. He was not on good terms with his mother and siblings represented by the first to third defendants (the family defendants (FD)) when he made his will and they contested probate proceedings claiming that D had died domiciled in Belgium and that the will was null and void under Belgium law, pleaded that ...

Costs: The final say on domicile and costs

Edward Rowntree gives an update on Morris v Davies A will shall be treated as properly executed if its execution conformed to the internal law in force in the territory where it was executed or in the territory where, at the time of its execution or of the testator’s death, he was domiciled. or had …
This post is only available to members.

Wharton v Bancroft & ors (costs) [2012] EWHC 91 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | May 2012 #119

Mr Wharton (D) died in 2008 and was survived by his second wife, Maureen (M), and by his three adult daughters, Victoria, Gina and Amanda. D and M had been living together for 32 years but only married three days before D’s death. He had been discharged from hospital earlier that day so that he could spend his last few days at home. During this time his solicitor (B) visited him at home and took instructions from him for a will. This left his entire £4m estate to M, in contemplation of their marriage that took place the same evening. Essentially, D made a ‘deathbed will’...

Cowderoy v Cranfield (costs) [2011] EWHC 2628 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2011 #115

The claimant had challenged the last will of the deceased dated 13 November 2006 (the deceased had died on 19 October 2008) on the bases of (1) lack of testamentary capacity, (2) want of knowledge and approval and (3) undue influence. The claimant failed on all those bases. The decision of Morgan J can be found at [2011] EWHC 1616 (Ch). On the issue of costs the claimant contended that there should be no order as to costs up to and including 26 September 2010 and thereafter that she should pay the defendant’s costs on the standard basis such liability not to be enforced without the...