Part 36: An offer you can’t refuse

James Marwick and Marcus Coates-Walker provide an invaluable summary of the latest decisions in the ever-changing arena of Part 36 offers ‘Hislop, it is submitted, is yet another instance of the court having to construct a Part of the CPR which was simply not drafted with fixed costs in mind and where the poor drafting …
This post is only available to members.

Mediation: A costly refusal

Bryan Johnston assesses the price of failing to mediate following the Court of Appeal ruling in PGF ‘PGF confirms that ADR is firmly at the heart of the civil procedure regime. A request to engage in ADR cannot be ignored or unreasonably refused without the strong possibility of a costs sanction.’With Voltaire-esque flair, the Court …
This post is only available to members.

Split Trials: A look to the future

Laura Sylvester and Verity Danziger examine the factors that will influence a judge to order a liability hearing Judicial comment in recent cases has provided some further guidance on matters to consider when deciding whether a case should proceed to a split trial or not. Contained within the court’s general powers of management, in Part …
This post is only available to members.

Part 36: Money: that’s what I want

Lee Coulthard outlines some common pitfalls in the use of Part 36 A Part 36 offer does not protect a party against its own serious misconduct, and practitioners should be ready to alert the court to such misconduct at the close of any trial where a Part 36 offer is not beaten. When seeking to …
This post is only available to members.

Costs: Reversing the normal rule in CPR 36

Paul Jones looks at the latest case concerning Part 36 offers The defendant’s case was that there was no reason to depart from the normal rule and, in particular, to apply the normal rule would not be unjust in all the circumstances. Of all the provision of the Civil Procedure Rules, CPR 36 has generated …
This post is only available to members.