Schedule 1: Relocation, relocation

Rayden Solicitors | Family Law Journal | December 2018/January 2019 #182
Shantel Burbridge analyses the court’s approach to a Schedule 1 case in which the applicant sought a replacement property for the benefit of the children ‘The court found that the replacement of one property by another does not amount to a new settlement of property, rather it is simply the substitution of one property for …

Continue reading "Schedule 1: Relocation, relocation"

This post is only available to members.

Cohabitants: Home truths

University of Greenwich | Family Law Journal | June 2017 #167
Mark Pawlowski summarises how a non-owning cohabitant can obtain capital provision under the Children Act 1989 ‘The practical effect of a settlement/transfer order made under Sch 1 is that, during the period of the children’s education, the house is held on trust for the non-owning party to the exclusion of the other party for the …

Continue reading "Cohabitants: Home truths"

This post is only available to members.

Children Act 1989, Schedule 1: The cost of childcare

Major Family Law | Family Law Journal | February 2013 #123
Rebecca Tarn sets out best practice for a successful Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 claim There appears to be some recognition that given that provision for a child only lasts during their dependency (at which time any property adjustment or settlement will revert to the respondent), the applicant should not be prohibited from making some …

Continue reading "Children Act 1989, Schedule 1: The cost of childcare"

This post is only available to members.