PG v TW [2012] EWHC B36 (Fam); [2012] EWHC 1892 (Fam); [2014] 1 FLR 923

Cohabitants: Home truths

Mark Pawlowski summarises how a non-owning cohabitant can obtain capital provision under the Children Act 1989 ‘The practical effect of a settlement/transfer order made under Sch 1 is that, during the period of the children’s education, the house is held on trust for the non-owning party to the exclusion of the other party for the …

Continue reading "Cohabitants: Home truths"

This post is only available to members.

Schedule 1: Missed opportunities

James Brown suggests that Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 is underused and looks at the courts’ approach ‘Schedule 1 can be applied to small/medium-asset cases even if the result is that the absent parent will have to sell their property in order to house the applicant and the child.’ Family law practitioners are …

Continue reading "Schedule 1: Missed opportunities"

This post is only available to members.

Legal Costs: Brave new world?

David Lister looks at a recent Schedule 1 decision and compares and contrasts A v A costs allowances with the new legal services orders ‘A “costs allowance” is not a “costs order”, and so falls outside the provisions of the FPR 2010 that there will generally be no order as to costs.’ In the Schedule …

Continue reading "Legal Costs: Brave new world?"

This post is only available to members.

Legalease Law Journals

Keyword Search

Content Type

Select Journal

Date Range

Case: PG v TW [2012] EWHC B36 (Fam); [2012] EWHC 1892 (Fam); [2014] 1 FLR 923

Cohabitants: Home truths

Schedule 1: Missed opportunities

Legal Costs: Brave new world?