Personal Injury Protocols: Sticking to the rules

Elite Law Cost Drafting | Personal Injury Law Journal | April 2017 #154
Brian Dempsey examines the rigid application of the fixed recoverable fees regime ‘The Court of Appeal has been consistently clear that the certainty provided by the careful scheme of fixed costs in CPR 45 would be undermined if the court was to apply the discretion provided by CPR 44 to decide whether to allow or …

Continue reading "Personal Injury Protocols: Sticking to the rules"

This post is only available to members.

Case Report: Patterson v Ministry of Defence[2012] EWHC 2767 (QB)

12 King’s Bench Walk (Chambers of Paul Russell QC) | Personal Injury Law Journal | December 2012/January 2013 #111
Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Rules; meaning of disease The differing levels of percentage increase/success fees are intended to reward those who take on cases that are more difficult or complex and thus have greater financial risk. In employer’s liability claims, the classification of an injury is particularly important when it comes to the assessment …

Continue reading "Case Report: Patterson v Ministry of Defence[2012] EWHC 2767 (QB)"

This post is only available to members.

Costs: A distinction without a difference

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | May 2011 #95
Paul Jones reviews a recent case that emphasises the discretion judges have when dealing with costs ‘Where a court considers that a party has acted unreasonably and, by virtue of that unreasonable conduct, has obtained a costs order on the standard basis rather than the more prescriptive fixed costs, the court can assess the costs …

Continue reading "Costs: A distinction without a difference"

This post is only available to members.