Assessment: Stay on track with costs

Ropewalk Chambers | Personal Injury Law Journal | July/August 2011 #97
Shilpa Shah examines the difficult relationship between allocation and costs recovery ‘It was contended that the court should assess costs at the level allowed by reference to the small claims track provisions.’ While one of the aims of allocation was to enable the principle of proportionality to be dovetailed into the costs rules appropriate for …

Continue reading "Assessment: Stay on track with costs"

This post is only available to members.

Road Traffic Accidents: When is a small claim not a small claim?

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | June 2011 #96
Paul Jones considers the latest Predictable Costs case ‘Where a claimant has issued proceedings prematurely, possibly with a view to avoiding being limited to Small Claims Fixed Costs, they may assess their Standard Basis costs at a sum equivalent to the costs that would have been payable on the Small Claims Track. This way, the …

Continue reading "Road Traffic Accidents: When is a small claim not a small claim?"

This post is only available to members.

Costs: A distinction without a difference

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | May 2011 #95
Paul Jones reviews a recent case that emphasises the discretion judges have when dealing with costs ‘Where a court considers that a party has acted unreasonably and, by virtue of that unreasonable conduct, has obtained a costs order on the standard basis rather than the more prescriptive fixed costs, the court can assess the costs …

Continue reading "Costs: A distinction without a difference"

This post is only available to members.