Costs: Out with the old

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | April 2017 #154
Paul Jones sets out the lack of consensus on proportionality since the end of ATE premiums and success fees ‘Regarding the exclusion of the ATE premium when considering proportionality, the master, again, drew a distinction between the pre-April 2013 rules, where the ATE would have been considered separately, and the new rules, where there was …

Continue reading "Costs: Out with the old"

This post is only available to members.

Costs: Additional problems with proportionality

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | February 2017 #152
Paul Jones analyses a recent case in which costs were incurred before and after the introduction of the current proportionality rules ‘In deciding whether the costs claimed are reasonable and (on a standard basis assessment) proportionate, the court will consider the amount of any additional liability separately from the base costs.’ If one could somehow …

Continue reading "Costs: Additional problems with proportionality"

This post is only available to members.