Brendan Cotter considers how likely a claim against a testamentary predator is to succeed ‘The classic sign of undue influence is the main beneficiary being active in the preparation of a will in which they take a substantial benefit.’As Hilaire Belloc wrote in Dedicatory Ode 1910: ‘The question’s very much too wide, and much too …
Continue reading "Wills: Crossing a line"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | October 2016 #163On 7 April 2016 judgment was delivered pronouncing for the force and validity of the will dated 1 February 2012 (2012 will) of Kenneth William Jordan (Mr Jordan) in solemn form of law and ordering that a caveat entered by the first defendant in respect of his estate cease to have effect. The normal rule of costs is that costs follow the event. However, the Court has discretion to make a different order, taking into account, for example, the conduct of the parties. In a contentious probate claim, there are also specific exceptions to the normal rule arising under case law and under the Ci...
Lydia Pilati considers the lessons to be learned from Brennan v Prior [2015] on contesting the validity of a will ‘Brennan highlights that although the burden of proof is upon the party seeking to propound the will, it is not simply enough to propound a will on due execution and capacity when the suspicion of …
Continue reading "Wills: A textbook claim"
This post is only available to members.
Araba Taylor examines Re Butcher [2015], a case that puts the principles of Gill v Woodall into practice ‘The single test comes into its own where the court has enough facts, expert opinions and other evidence to enable it to make findings as to how the will was prepared and/or executed.’ Before the CA decision …
Continue reading "Wills: One step, two step…"
This post is only available to members.
Tim Harrison sets out the current position on caveats ‘Earlier in the year there was an apparent change in the procedures regarding the entry of a caveat, although the change was not communicated to those who practise this area of law.’ Lindley LJ said, at p216 of the Court of Appeal decision in Moran v …
Continue reading "Caveats: Back to basics"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | May 2012 #119Mr Wharton (D) had been married many years ago and had two daughters from that marriage, Victoria and Gina, (V and G) the third and fourth defendants. He had another relationship which resulted in a third child, Amanda (A), the fifth defendant. He divorced his first wife in 1977 and cohabited with the claimant, Maureen, (M) who took his surname but did not marry him until immediately prior to his death in 2008. Between 1979 and 1995 D made and executed three successive wills all leaving substantial property to M and providing for his children, and some of M’s children, in various w...
