Hood v HMRC [2017] WTLR 999

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Autumn 2017 #169

Lady Hood was the lessee of premises at 67 and 67A Chelsea Square, London SW3 (premises) which had been granted by Viscount Chelsea and Chelsea Land & Investment Company Ltd and Cadogan Holdings Company (Cadogan) on 21 September 1979 for a term due to expire on 25 December 2076 (head lease). By licence granted by Cadogan a reversionary sub lease of the premises was granted by Lady Hood to her sons on 19 June 1997 to commence on 25 March 2012 and to expire on 22 December 2076 (sub lease). Lady Hood as sub-lessor and her sons as sub-lessees respectively covenanted to perform and observ...

Succession Planning: Having your cake?

Jennifer Emms considers the outcome of schemes used to reduce IHT on the family home and outlines best practice ‘While I understand the legal distinction that has been drawn between the Hood case and Buzzoni, the practical result seems to be somewhat arbitrary.’ I am a fan of all things sweet, in particular, cake, whether …
This post is only available to members.

Hood [2016] UKFTT 059 (TC)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | June 2016 #160

Lady Hood was the lessee of the property in Chelsea (‘the property’) pursuant to a lease (‘the head lease’) dated 21 September 1979 and made between (1) Viscount Chelsea (‘the head lessor’) (2) the Chelsea Land & Investment Company Limited (‘Chelsea land”); (3) Cadogan Holdings Company (‘Cadogan’) and (4) Lady Hood. The head lease contained a covenant by the lessee not to transfer underlet or part with possession of part of the demised premises without consent of Cadogan. The head lease also contained a right for the head lessor or the Company to forfeit the head lease for breaches o...

Gifts With Reservation: A win for the taxpayer

Mary Ashley gives an update on the long-running case of Buzzoni v HMRC ‘Buzzoni provided a rare opportunity for the Court of Appeal to clarify how the gifts with reservation rules apply.’ The reservation of benefit rules in relation to inheritance tax (IHT) have always been a hiccup in the planning context. This has led …
This post is only available to members.

Buzzoni v HMRC [2013] EWCA Civ 1684

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | April 2014 #138

On 5 June 1996 Mrs Kamhi purchased a lease (the headlease) of a flat in Knightsbridge, London. On 21 November 1997 Mrs Kamhi granted an underlease (the underlease) to Ovalap Nominees Ltd. The underlease was granted without rent or premium being payable. On the same day Mrs Kamhi created by deed a settlement. The trustee was Legis Trust Ltd and the trust property was the underlease. Ovalap entered into the underlease as bare nomiee for Legis Trust Ltd.

On 24 March 2004 Parkside (Knightsbridge) Residents Ltd then granted Mrs Kamhi a new lease over the flat commencing 1 April 2003. ...

Inheritance Tax And Property: Tread carefully

Guy Abrahams assesses Buzzoni v HMRC, which indicates the court’s current attitude towards reversionary lease schemes ‘If Mrs Kamhi had not been required by her landlord to obtain covenants from the tenant, and therefore been able to grant Ovalap a covenant-free underlease, it seems that the underlease would have achieved its intended purpose.’ The case …
This post is only available to members.

Buzzoni & ors v HMRCC [2012] UKUT 360 (TCC)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | January/February 2013 #126

On 5 June 1996 Mrs Kamhi purchased a lease (the headlease) of a flat in Knightsbridge, London. On 21 November 1997 Mrs Kamhi granted an underlease (the underlease) to Ovalap Nominees Ltd. The underlease was granted without rent or premium being payable. On the same day Mrs Kamhi created by deed a settlement. The trustee was Legis Trust Ltd and the trust property was the underlease. Ovalap entered into the underlease as bare nominee for Legis Trust Ltd.

On 24 March 2004 Parkside (Knightsbridge) Residents Ltd then granted Mrs Kamhi a new lease over the flat commencing 1 April 2003. ...

Mclaughlin v HMRCC [2012] UKFTT 174 (TC)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | June 2012 #120

James Albert McLaughlin (taxpayer), who was UK resident, engaged in a marketed planning scheme to avoid tax on a capital gain that he had made on the sale of a business. The scheme involved the acquisition by exchange of shares for overseas registered loan notes issued by two subsidiaries of Skandia UK Ltd (loan notes). The taxpayer then transferred the loan notes to SG Hambros Trust Company Ltd (trustee) to hold on the trusts of a settlor-interested settlement that he had established on 5 February 2003. By a deed of addition made a month later, the trustee added Adrian Gower, who was do...

Re JDS; Smyth v JDS [2012] COP 10334473

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | April 2012 #118

In 2001 the patient, J, received a settlement of £2,090,000 damages in respect of cerebral palsy suffered as a result of complications at the time of his birth in 1991. Of this, £1,611,222 was attributable to his future care needs. J is an only child. His father was born in 1959 and his mother in 1962. He lives with them in a house bought in October 2000 for £349,950 from an interim payment that is held by his parents and Mr Smyth (S), his receiver (now the deputy) as his trustees. Its current value is estimated at £675,000. J’s life expectancy was originally assessed in 1998 as la...