Womble Bond Dickinson (Trust Corporation) Ltd & ors v Glenn & ors [2021] WTLR 737

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2021 #183

The trustees of a settlement sought directions as to whether they could advance capital to certain beneficiaries pursuant to their powers under s32 Trustee Act 1925, as varied by a clause of the trust deed, so as to bring the trust to an end. They sought a declaration as to whether the proposed advancements were within the power as a matter of construction, (ie whether there were beneficiaries with interests prior to those of the beneficiaries in whose favour the advancements were to be made, whose consent was required), and, presuming that they were within that power, the court...

The Trustee Act 1925: Built to last

Jessica Henson and Charlotte Henshall discuss a rare study of the statutory power of advancement The guiding principle of a power of advancement is that the application of capital must ‘improve the material situation of the beneficiary’. As Benito Mussolini proclaimed himself ‘Il Duce’ of Italy and Virginia Woolf was streaming consciousness in Mrs Dalloway, …
This post is only available to members.

Macintyre & anr v Oliver & ors [2019] WTLR 215

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2019 #174

The claimants were the trustees of the trusts arising under the wills of Violet Hamblen-Thomas (Violet) and Charles Hamben-Thomas (Charles). They had issued a Part 8 claim form seeking the guidance of the court as to the true construction of the will trusts and as to the identification of the beneficiaries, represented by the defendants. Apart from her only son, Edwin Hamblen-Thomas (Edwin), Violet had a life-long friend, Enid Simpson, whose daughter was the first and second defendant (Victoria). Violet, by her will dated 16 December 1968 (Violet’s will), gave Charles a life interest in ...