McLean & ors v McLean [2023] WTLR 267

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2023 #190

The claimants were all siblings and the biological children of Reginald McLean (Reginald), by his first marriage. The defendant was the biological child of Reginald and his second wife, Maureen (the deceased).

By mirror wills executed on 23 June 2017, Reginald and the deceased both left their estates to each other as survivors, and the residuary estate of the surviving spouse to the claimants and the defendant in equal shares (the 2017 wills). Following Reginald’s death, the deceased executed a new will on 16 August 2019 (the 2019 will) revoking her 2017 will and leaving her entir...

Testamentary undue influence: Hope over experience

John Poyser pinpoints the warning signs for testamentary undue influence, with lessons from a recent Canadian case ‘If the will-maker feels compelled to leave their wealth to a different collection of people, whether by overpowering fear or overpowering hope, then the resulting will is void.’ A recent Canadian case highlights some fresh perspectives on testamentary …
This post is only available to members.