Mark Pawlowski provides an update on whether detriment is a necessary requirement in joint ownership cases involving the family home The deal was sufficient to establish the common intention and the common intention was sufficient to establish the constructive trust. There has been considerable debate as to whether a claimant seeking to establish an enlarged …
Continue reading "Joint ownership: Common intention and detriment"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2021 #182In consolidated proceedings, the claimant sought a declaration that she was beneficially entitled to 50% of 41 properties on the basis of a common intention constructive trust, a partnership or proprietary estoppel. The claimant also sought relief under ss994 and 996 of the Companies Act 2006 on the grounds of unfair prejudice.
The claimant and the first defendant were in a relationship between 1995 and 2015, moving in together in 1996, and having two children. The second defendant was incorporated on 16 September 1996: 51 shares were issued to the first defendant and two shares w...
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Winter 2020 #181This was a second appeal against the decision of HHJ Pelling to overturn the trial judge’s order declaring inter alia that A was a 50% beneficial owner of A and R’s former home (the property) under a common intention constructive trust.
The trial judge had found that A’s father had bought the property in 1998 with the intention that it should be A and R’s family home. In 2008, A’s father had transferred the property to R for nil consideration. The trial judge had found that A’s father intended A to have a beneficial interest in it and had originally planned to transfer it into A a...
