Interim payments: You can’t always get what you want

Jasmine Murphy analyses how to defend applications for interim payments ‘CPR 25.7(5) directs that the court must take into account contributory negligence when determining whether the amount sought is not more than a reasonable proportion of the likely final judgment amount.’ Interim payment applications are often the battleground for pre-trial skirmishes, the warm-up before the …
This post is only available to members.

Interim Payments: Room for rent

Deidre Goodwin analyses Eeles applications and the case for reviewing Roberts v Johnstone ‘The leit motif running through reported Eeles and trial decisions is that Roberts v Johnstone [1989] is an imperfect solution.’Has the time come to reconsider the validity of the apparently immutable Roberts v Johnstone [1989] principle in order to provide a fairer …
This post is only available to members.

Advocate’s Advice: Be prepared

Bill Braithwaite offers a round-up of some notable recent cases in personal injury law ‘There should always be good reasons for a claimant to choose a more expensive option, and it will make life easier for all if those reasons are explained to the insurer.’ As we approach the end of the year I thought …
This post is only available to members.