Wills & Trusts Law Reports | April 2015 #148On 20 August 2012 Richard Wright signed a discretionary trust of which the National Westminster Bank was the trustee. The beneficiaries named were the widow, children and remoter issue of the settlor. There was a power to add beneficiaries but not the settlor or anyone who has previously added property to the settlement or the spouse of the settlor.
Clause 15 stated that no capital or income could be paid to the settlor, the spouse of the settlor or anyone who had added property.
At the first meeting with the bank the representative of the bank specifically ...
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | November 2013 #134In 2001 Mr Pagel (P) and Mr Farman (F), set up a hedge fund. At first they shared responsibility for marketing and investment equally, but F began to concentrate on investing and P dealt with marketing and client relationships and F began to find the split unfair, so that from 2004 the 50/50 split was renegotiated and F received two thirds of the performance fees, but paid the cost of fixed employee bonuses and shared management fees 50/50 with P. Initially, both partners had to sign confirmations for all withdrawals but from autumn 2006 this only applied to amounts over £5,000. For a nu...
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | July/August 2013 #131The first appeal concerned two settlements, made with non-resident trustees, by Mr Futter. Considerable ‘stockpiled’ gains were rolled up while the trusts were non-resident and, in exercise of the powers conferred by the trusts, new resident trustees were appointed and capital was distributed to Mr Futter and his children in the mistaken belief that the ‘stockpiled’ gains, which would be attributed to them, would be absorbed by allowable losses that had been realised, so that no liability to capital gains tax would arise. In advising as to the effect of s87 of the Taxation a...
Marilyn McKeever discusses the implications of the Supreme Court decision in Futter v Futter and Pitt v Holt ‘The Hastings-Bass jurisdiction applies where the trustee or other person has failed to take into account any relevant considerations or took into account irrelevant considerations and would not have taken the action they did but for that …
Continue reading "Trustees: Back on the right course?"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | January/February 2013 #126The claimant (SL) sought rectification of a deed of trust that he and his late wife (PL) had executed in 2006.
SL and PL determined, on the advice of Mr Tollins (a financial advisor at the Norwich & Peterborough Building Society (the building society)) that they wanted £100,000 (just under half of their net assets at the time) to be held in a Legal & General portfolio bond, which was to be held on a flexible trust for the benefit of their children and grandchildren. They expressed an intention to be able to alter the class of discretionary objects and the percentage entitl...
Antoaneta Proctor outlines the facts and ramifications of Pitt & anor v Holt & anor ‘In Pitt & anor v Holt & anor Lloyd LJ reached a conclusion that what has become known as the rule in Hastings-Bass is actually not a correct statement of the law.’ Can a receiver of a patient whose offices …
Continue reading "Trustees: Unanticipated outcomes"
This post is only available to members.
