Financial Provision: Extra special

Pannone, part of Slater & Gordon | Family Law Journal | April 2015 #145
Claire Reid looks at what is required for the court to conclude that a party has made a stellar contribution ‘The difficulty in comparing different contributions risks discrimination against homemakers. This unfortunate application of the law generates a distasteful distinction in the 21st century.’ In Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] one of the principal issues considered …

Continue reading "Financial Provision: Extra special"

This post is only available to members.

Litigation Conduct: Drawing inferences

Lake Legal LLP | Family Law Journal | October 2013 #130
Frances Bailey considers the courts’ approach where a party’s conduct during proceedings is in issue ‘An analysis of any add-back argument must also include an analysis of what both parties have spent and that the argument must be analysed in context.’ As ever, the law reports are seemingly full of cases where one party’s approach …

Continue reading "Litigation Conduct: Drawing inferences"

This post is only available to members.

Substantial Assets: Setting ground rules

29 Bedford Row Chambers | Family Law Journal | April 2013 #125
Max Lewis looks at the lessons to be learnt from Evans v Evans on managing expectations, contributions and add-back argument The court retains jurisdiction to decide the true nature of an order and must assess what the parties agreed against the ‘objective factual matrix of what occurred during the relevant period’. Moylan J’s judgment in …

Continue reading "Substantial Assets: Setting ground rules"

This post is only available to members.