Re Various Incapacitated Persons
 [2018] WTLR 1511

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Winter 2018 #170

The court was asked to consider the applications, made on behalf of 36 incapacitated persons, to appoint a trust corporation as their property and affairs deputy. There was currently no agreed system through which the court could know that any particular trust corporation was suitable to be appointed as deputy, nor a ‘panel’ of approved trust corporations.

The following questions arose:

  1. A. Could a trust corporation lawfully act as a deputy?
  2. B. How could a trust corporation satisfy the court that it was appropriate for it to act as deputy?
  3. C. How shou...

Statutory Wills: Doing the right thing

Re Gladys Meek [2014] has lessons on safeguarding the mentally incapable from loss. Sam Chandler analyses the case. ‘The judge considered that it could not be in Mrs Meek’s best interests to require what was left of her resources to be expended on litigation to remedy the deputies’ default when a straightforward alternative was available.’ …
This post is only available to members.

Re Gladys Meek; Jones v Parkin & ors [2014] EWCOP 1

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2014 #142

Mr Jones, the property and affairs deputy for Gladys Meek, asked for the court to authorise a statutory will leaving everything between National Trust for Scotland and a charity connected with the Christadelphian Church. He also asked for an order calling in the £275,000 security bond against her two former deputies, Mrs Miller and Mrs Johnson, and a direction as to whether he should refer the conduct of the two former deputies to the police.

Mrs Meek was born in 1919, widowed in 1961 and predeceased by her only child Barbara in 2010. Both her husband and Barbara died intestate an...

SM v HM 11875043/01

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | March 2012 #117

HM was born on 3 April 2004 and suffered from cerebral palsy following injuries she sustained during her birth. She was likely to lack capacity on reaching 18 and it was agreed that the Court of Protection had jurisdiction over her property and affairs. Proceedings against the relevant NHS trust for damages were compromised in 2010. The level of compromise damages was much less than the real level of HM’s likely care needs owing to leading counsel’s advice that her claim stood only a 25% to 33% prospect of success.

On 10 September 2010, District Judge Ashton had refus...