Damages: Avoiding a penalty

Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP | Procurement & Outsourcing Journal | January/February 2016 #28
Noel McMichael and Clare Arthurs analyse the impact of Makdessi ‘The Supreme Court looked at two main questions: when is the penalty rule engaged, and what makes a contractual provision penal?’ The Supreme Court has re-examined the rule against penalties in contracts. Its judgment in the joined cases of Cavendish Square Holding BV v El …

Continue reading "Damages: Avoiding a penalty"

This post is only available to members.

The Law On Penalties: Where are we now?

Nabarro LLP | Property Law Journal | December 2015/January 2016 #337
Natalie Appleby considers the position on penalties after the recent Supreme Court ruling in Cavendish and ParkingEye ‘The Supreme Court considered the development of the doctrine over time and declared that Lord Dunedin’s four tests from Dunlop have been taken out of context and applied too rigidly as a “quasi-statutory code”.’ Just over a century …

Continue reading "The Law On Penalties: Where are we now?"

This post is only available to members.