Cowan v Foreman & ors [2019] WTLR 441

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2019 #175

The claimant applied for an order under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act), s2, against the estate of her deceased husband (the deceased). Probate of the deceased’s will was granted on 16 December 2016 and the application was made on 8 November 2018. Under s4 of the 1975 Act, except with the permission of the court any application for an order under s2 was to be made within six months of the date of the grant. This was an application for permission to make the substantive application out of t...

Practice: Service can be a right hassle

Carl Troman assesses a recent decision on service by email ‘By the time the appeal reached the Supreme Court there was no issue about the fact that service was invalid and the case simply turned upon whether a retrospective validation of service should be granted.’ The Supreme Court has recently given judgment in Barton v …
This post is only available to members.

Mis-service of the claim form: A triumph of form over substance?

Howard Elgot and Abigail Telford discuss a case that ended up in the Supreme Court concerning a procedural issue ‘Those seeking to serve a claim form by any mode should take particular care to comply with the rules and practice directions.‘ In Barton v Wright Hassall [2018], the claimant (C), acting as a litigant in …
This post is only available to members.

Insights by Penningtons Manches: In the ring

Clare Arthurs and Nicole Finlayson look at litigants in person and service by email ‘Mr Barton‘s case at first instance was that he had complied with the rules because Berrymans‘ email correspondence with him amounted to an “indication“ under CPR PD 6A.4.1 that they would accept service by email.‘ Litigants in person do not have …
This post is only available to members.

Forum: Rules of service

Max Archer and Kate Boakes provide an introduction to serving claims out of the jurisdiction ‘In answering the question of whether England and Wales is a natural forum for a case, the court must consider whether the action has a real and substantial connection with the jurisdiction.’ This is an article about service, a neglected …
This post is only available to members.