Continue reading "Set aside: Original thinking"
This post is only available to members.
Set aside: Original thinking
Matt Vincent considers the circumstances in which a financial order may be set aside and the available scope in cases involving a significant change in asset values In CB v EB Mostyn J found that where there is an inconsistency between statute and a practice direction, it is the practice direction that must be declared …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
- CS v ACS & anor [2015] EWHC 1005
- Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61
- KU (A Child) v Liverpool City Council [2005] EWCA Civ 475
- Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 120
- Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60