Continue reading "Vacant Possession: Take it away"
This post is only available to members.
Vacant Possession: Take it away
Rosalind Cullis discusses a case which serves as a salutary reminder of the importance of compliance with break conditions ‘If there is a substantial impediment to the landlord’s use of the property, or a substantial part of it, then vacant possession has not been given.’ What amounts to vacant possession has, once again, been considered …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Arnold v Britton & ors [2015] UKSC 36
- Cumberland Consolidated Holdings Ltd v Ireland [1946] KB 264
- Hellawell v Eastwood (1851) 6 Ex 295
- Legal & General Assurance Society Ltd v Expeditors International (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 1008 (Ch)
- NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683
- Riverside Park Ltd v NHS Property Services Ltd [2016] EWHC 1313 (Ch)