Continue reading "Post-Termination Restrictions: Winning damages in One Step"
This post is only available to members.
Post-Termination Restrictions: Winning damages in One Step
A recent Court of Appeal decision may make it easier for employers to obtain Wrotham Park damages, explains Bob Fahy ‘Devenish can leave a claimant in difficulties where the problem is a lack of evidence to demonstrate loss. One potential solution is to seek Wrotham Park damages.’The remedies available where an ex-employee has unlawfully used …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Attorney General v Blake [2000] UKHL 45
- Devenish Nutrition Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis SA [2008] EWCA Civ 1086
- Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc [2003] EWCA Civ 323
- Lonmar Global Risks Ltd v West & ors [2010] EWHC 2878 (QB)
- Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 180; [2018] UKSC 20
- Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798
- WWF – World Wide Fund for Nature & anor v World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc [2007] EWCA Civ 286