Continue reading "Expert Determination: Jurisdictional issues"
This post is only available to members.
Expert Determination: Jurisdictional issues
James Farrell, Michael Mendelblat and Emily Lew explore a spate of recent case law relating to expert determination ‘Parties should try to agree whether the expert’s decision on a point of law will be treated as final and binding or whether the disappointed party should have the right to refer the issue to the court.’ …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Barclays Bank plc v Nylon Capital LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 826
- Mercury Communications v Director General of Telecommunications [1994] CLC 1125 (CA)
- Nikko Hotels (UK) Ltd v MEPC plc [1991] 2 EGLR 103
- Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v P&O Property Holdings [1993] 1 EGLR 164
- Persimmon Homes Ltd v Woodford Land Ltd [2011] EWHC 3109 (Ch)
- Premium Nafta Products Ltd (20th Defendant) & ors v Fili Shipping Company Ltd & ors [2007] UKHL 40
- Wilky Property Holdings Plc v London & Surrey Investments Ltd [2011] EWHC 2888 (Ch)