Continue reading "Breach Of Trust: Dishonest or unconscionable?"
This post is only available to members.
Breach Of Trust: Dishonest or unconscionable?
The Starglade case casts light on the meaning of dishonesty in the context of accessory liability, as Mark Pawlowski discusses ‘In Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002], the majority of the House of Lords concluded that dishonesty also required a dishonest state of mind. This approach, however, was rejected by the Privy Council in Barlow Clowes …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Abou-Rahmah v Abacha [2006] WTLR 377
- Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson [1990] EWCA Civ 2
- Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Akindele [2000] EWCA Civ 502; [2000] WTLR 1049 CA
- Barlow Clowes International Ltd & anr v Eurotrust International Ltd & ors [2005] UKPC 37; [2005] WTLR 1453 PC (IoM)
- City Index Ltd & ors v Gawler & ors [2008] WTLR 1773
- Hanco ATM Systems Ltd v Cashbox ATM Systems Ltd [2007] EWHC 1599 (Ch)
- R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053
- Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] UKPC 4
- Starglade Properties Ltd v Nash [2010] WTLR 1267; [2010] EWCA Civ 1314
- Statek Corporation v Alford [2008] WTLR 1089
- Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley & ors [2002] UKHL 12; [2002] WTLR 423 HL
- Westpac Banking Corporation v Savin [1985] 2 NZLR 41
- Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & anor v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55; [2008] WTLR 1461 HL
- Zambia v Meer Care & Desai (a firm) & ors [2007] EWHC 952 (Ch)